Conformity and Contmporary

  How many people do you suppose are truly saved inside a Church?  I dare say that the only ones are children or those others that have thought they were saved and realized they were not.  Where that leaves us is that the majority are saved outside the church (as it should be).  Those that join a church will join in, western culture, a church that most resembles their worldy lifestyle.  Contemporary churchs will afford these new Christians a venue to be Christian and Secular at the same time.  These will identify with the Worldly Culture easier and no non-conformity with the world is required since the world is condoned in the Church.  Best of both worlds. What a shame and sham.

Allen

SBC Resolution

WHEREAS, For the past fifty years wickedness and family collapse have been increasing rapidly, and at the same time we have seen that programs and strategies alone cannot revive lagging baptism rates or anemic discipleship;



Then go back 51 years ago and do those things again because they were working.  This progressive move we are taking in today's Church is doing more harm than good.

Allen

Compromise Or Conformity?

      When did we as Christians allow the world to take the things, grounded in truth, and pervert them into something secular and now the Church wants a part of it and we have a perverted truth? Romans 12:1 says not to be conformed to this world... Go back to the truth. When the Church local moves from truth, why did not the Godly stay and fight to stay on the foundation of truth but rather leave and go somewhere else? Are the mature Christians tired of the battle against secularism? Please do not abandon your watch tower. Allen

Contemporary -- Just another name for Rebellion

Think back to the 1960's and 1970's and forward. Music, Hair style, Clothing, Attitude. I lived it. It all started as Rebellion to the Traditional establishment.

"The American Dream" Mis-Defined

As I read a popular writer/pastor this week,  I noticed he finally (after 46 pages) defined the "American Dream " he is so opposed and called Unbiblilcal.  I did an informal questioning of a cross section of the people I work with or socially accociate with of  how they would define "The American Dream".  Not one of them gave me the definition defined in the book.  Martin Luther King in his July 4,1965 speech also did not define it the way this pastor defined it.

I think before one uses "The American Dream" term in the title of the book, one should have the proper definition before he accuses people for being wrong and un-biblical.  Many people that I asked about the book were quite offended by that implication.

Maybe the definition is more generational defined than applying to all people.  If his definition applies to you, then read on.  It is hard to move past false accusations to trust anything else in the writing.

RINOs, DINOs, and CINOs

During the election season we heard a great deal about RINOs (Republicans in name only), DINOs (Democrats in name only).  These are not committed to their party affiliation but are just doing their on thing with their party label.  These are using the party label just to promote their on purposes.  What about CINOs?  (Christian in name only)
As we start this new year, lets not be Christian in name only.  We should walk in a way worthy of the name of Christ Jesus.  Consider what He endured for us; should we not live our lives with utmost integrity?  May we (I) not mar the name of Jesus in 2011.

As Santa increases, The Savior Decreases

I have noticed this year that Santa Clause has really become the for-front of Christmas.  The greater Santa becomes the less Jesus is recognized.  Wow, is not Jesus and redemption and reconciliation the real reason for Christmas?  Jesus has all but booted out of Christmas.  We argue if He can even be a part of public Christmas displays. This is just wrong.  Why have Believers allowed this to happen?  Will we get it back?  Even the Church has bought into this.